Allen, P.G. (1986). Who is your mother?: Red roots of white feminism. Retrieved October 8, 2020, from https://www.historyisaweapon.com/defcon1/allenredrootsofwhitefeminism
.html
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands = la frontera: the new mestiza. San Francisco, CA:
Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
Bates, J. C., Macarthy, F., & Warren-Riley, S. (2019). Emphasizing embodiment, intersectionality, and access: Social justice through technofeminism past, present, and future. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from: http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/03_Bates_Macarthy_Warren_Riley/.
Beck, E. (2016). Who is Tracking You? A Rhetorical Framework for Evaluating Surveillance and Privacy Practices. In Apostel, S. & Folk, M. (Eds.). Establishing and evaluating digital ethos and online credibility, (pp. 66-84). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Beck, E., Crow, A. DeVoss, D., et al. (2016). Writing in the age of surveillance, privacy, and net neutrality. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 20(2). Retrieved from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/20.2/topoi/beck-et-al/index.html.
Blair, K. & Tulley, C. (2007). Whose research is it , anyway?: The challenge of developing feminist methodology in technological spaces. In H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues(pp. 303-317). New York: Hampton Press.
Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Durham, NC: Duke UP.
Carastathis, A. (2013). Identity categories as potential coalitions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), pp. 941-965.
CBC Radio. (2018, November 2). Bad algorithms are making racist decisions. CBC/Radio-Canada. Retrieved from: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/spark/bad-algorithms-are-making-racist-decisions-1.4887504.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), pp. 785-810.
Chow-White, P. (2012). Genomic databases and an emerging digital divide in biotechnology. In Nakamura, L., & Chow-White, P. (Eds.). Race after the internet (pp. 271-290). New York: Routledge.
Combahee River Collective. (2015). The Combahee River Collective Statement. United States. [Archived Web Site] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0028151/.
Coastan, J. (2019, May 28). The intersectionality wars. Vox. Retrieved October 4, 2020, from
https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/5/20/18542843/intersectionality-conservatism-law-race-gender-discrimination
Cooper, B. C. (2018). Eloquent rage: A black feminist discovers her superpower. London, England: Picador.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cottom, T. M. (2019) Thick and other essays. New York: The New Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, 1989 University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139.
Crenshaw, K. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. New York: The New Press.
Dennen, V.P. (2013). When public words are not data: Online authorship, consent, and reasonable expectation of privacy. In D. Heider & A. Massanari (Eds). Digital ethics: Research and practice (pp. 21-38). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
DeVoss, D. N., Haas, A., & Rhodes, J. (2019). Introduction by the guest editors. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/00_Editors/.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gay, R. (2014). Bad feminist: Essays. New York: Harper Perennial.
Gilliard, C. & Culik, H. (2016, May 24). Digital redlining, access, and privacy. Common Sense Education. Retrieved from: https://www.commonsense.org/education/articles/digital-redlining-access-and-privacy.
Glenn, E. N. (2002). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American freedom and labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Goodling, L. (2015). MOAR digital activism, please. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 19(3). Retrieved from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.3/topoi/goodling/index.html.
Grabowski, M. & Yeng, S. (2013). To post or not to post: Philosophical and ethical considerations for mug shot websites. In D. Heider & A. Massanari (Eds). Digital ethics: Research and practice (pp. 99-116). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Haas, A. M. (2018). Toward a digital cultural rhetoric. In J. Alexander & J. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric (412-22).
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege or partial perspectives. Feminist Studies, 14, pp. 575-599.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.
--. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (Eds). Feminist Epistemologies. London: Routledge.
Hayes, T. J. (2017). #MyNYPD: Transforming twitter into a public place for protest. Computers and Composition, 43, pp. 118-134.
Hess, A. (2018). Introduction: Theorizing digital rhetoric. In Hess, A. & Davisson. A. (Eds). Theorizing digital rhetoric (pp. 1-16). London, England: Routledge.
Hill Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(4), pp. 745-773.
Hill Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London, England: Routledge.
Holbrook, S. E. (1991). Women’s work: The feminizing of composition. Rhetoric Review, 9(2): 201-29.
hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: from margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Intemann, K. (2010). 25 years of feminist empiricism and standpoint theory: Where are we now? Hypatia, 25(4), pp. 778-796.
Johnson, M., Levy, D., Manthey, K., & Novotny, M. (2015). Embodiment: Embodying feminist rhetorics. Peitho, 18(1), pp. 39-43.
Jones Royster, J. (2000). Traces of the stream: Literacy and social change among African-american women. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kennedy, K., & Wilson, N. (2019). In Reyman, J. & Sparby, E.M. (Eds.) Digital ethics: Rhetoric and responsibility in online aggression (pp. 198-215). New York, NY: Routledge.
Langford, C. L. & Speight, M. #BlackLives Matter: Epistemic positioning, challenges, and possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 5(3/4), pp.78-89.
Lewis, T. (2006). Critical surveillance literacy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6(2), pp. 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605279700.
Long, S., & Fitch, K. (2019) Digital surveillance of gang communication: graffiti’s rhetorical velocity between street gangs and urban law enforcement. In Jim Ridolfo. & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.) Rhet ops: Rhetoric and information warfare (pp. 170-182). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh UP.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Marx, G.T. (1998). Ethics of a new surveillance. The Information Society, 14, pp. 171-185.
--. (2015). Surveillance Studies. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, pp. 733–741.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), pp. 1771-1800.
McKee, H.A., & Porter, J.E. (2017). Professional communication and network interaction: A rhetorical and ethical approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Miller, S. (1991). The feminization of composition. In, R. Bullock & J. Trimbur (Eds.), The politics of writing instruction: Postsecondary. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Novotny, M. & Hutchinson, L. (2019). Data our bodies tell: Towards critical feminist action in fertility and period tracking applications. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), pp. 332-360.
Opel, D. (2018). Ethical research in health 2.0: Considerations for scholars of medical rhetoric. In L. Meloncon & J. B. Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health & medicine (pp. 176-194). New York: Routledge.
Perry, G. K. (2009). Black feminist thought. In J. O’Brien (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Gender and Society (74-76). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Ridolfo, J. & DeVoss, D. N. (2009). Composing for recomposition: rhetorical velocity and delivery. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13(2). Retrieved from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/velocity.html.
Schell, E. E. Researching feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies. In E. E. Schell &K.J. Rawson (Eds.), Rhetorica in motion: Feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies (pp. 1-20). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), pp. 33-47.
Tetreault, L. (2019). White women voted for trump: The women’s march on washington and intersectional feminist futures. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from: http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/01_Tetreault/
Verloo, M. (2013). Intersectional and cross-movement politics and policies: Reflections on current practices and debates. Signs, 38(4), pp. 893-915.
Vie, S. (2008). Digital divide 2.0: ‘Generation m’ and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 25, pp. 9-23.
Walton, R., Moore, K. R., & Jones, N.N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. New York: Routledge.
Wylie, (2003). Why standpoint matters. In Robert Figueroa & Sandra Harding (Eds.), Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophy of science and technology (pp. 26-48). New York: Routledge.
.html
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands = la frontera: the new mestiza. San Francisco, CA:
Spinsters/Aunt Lute.
Bates, J. C., Macarthy, F., & Warren-Riley, S. (2019). Emphasizing embodiment, intersectionality, and access: Social justice through technofeminism past, present, and future. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from: http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/03_Bates_Macarthy_Warren_Riley/.
Beck, E. (2016). Who is Tracking You? A Rhetorical Framework for Evaluating Surveillance and Privacy Practices. In Apostel, S. & Folk, M. (Eds.). Establishing and evaluating digital ethos and online credibility, (pp. 66-84). Hershey, Pennsylvania: IGI Global.
Beck, E., Crow, A. DeVoss, D., et al. (2016). Writing in the age of surveillance, privacy, and net neutrality. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy, 20(2). Retrieved from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/20.2/topoi/beck-et-al/index.html.
Blair, K. & Tulley, C. (2007). Whose research is it , anyway?: The challenge of developing feminist methodology in technological spaces. In H. A. McKee & D. N. DeVoss (Eds.), Digital writing research: Technologies, methodologies, and ethical issues(pp. 303-317). New York: Hampton Press.
Browne, S. (2015). Dark matters: On the surveillance of blackness. Durham, NC: Duke UP.
Carastathis, A. (2013). Identity categories as potential coalitions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), pp. 941-965.
CBC Radio. (2018, November 2). Bad algorithms are making racist decisions. CBC/Radio-Canada. Retrieved from: https://www.cbc.ca/radio/spark/bad-algorithms-are-making-racist-decisions-1.4887504.
Cho, S., Crenshaw, K. W., & McCall, L. (2013). Toward a field of intersectionality studies: Theory, applications, and praxis. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 38(4), pp. 785-810.
Chow-White, P. (2012). Genomic databases and an emerging digital divide in biotechnology. In Nakamura, L., & Chow-White, P. (Eds.). Race after the internet (pp. 271-290). New York: Routledge.
Combahee River Collective. (2015). The Combahee River Collective Statement. United States. [Archived Web Site] Retrieved from the Library of Congress, https://www.loc.gov/item/lcwaN0028151/.
Coastan, J. (2019, May 28). The intersectionality wars. Vox. Retrieved October 4, 2020, from
https://www.vox.com/the-highlight/2019/5/20/18542843/intersectionality-conservatism-law-race-gender-discrimination
Cooper, B. C. (2018). Eloquent rage: A black feminist discovers her superpower. London, England: Picador.
Costanza-Chock, S. (2020). Design justice: Community-led practices to build the worlds we need. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Cottom, T. M. (2019) Thick and other essays. New York: The New Press.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory, and antiracist politics, 1989 University of Chicago Legal Forum, 139.
Crenshaw, K. (2017). On intersectionality: Essential writings. New York: The New Press.
Dennen, V.P. (2013). When public words are not data: Online authorship, consent, and reasonable expectation of privacy. In D. Heider & A. Massanari (Eds). Digital ethics: Research and practice (pp. 21-38). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
DeVoss, D. N., Haas, A., & Rhodes, J. (2019). Introduction by the guest editors. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/00_Editors/.
Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality. New York: Pantheon Books.
Gay, R. (2014). Bad feminist: Essays. New York: Harper Perennial.
Gilliard, C. & Culik, H. (2016, May 24). Digital redlining, access, and privacy. Common Sense Education. Retrieved from: https://www.commonsense.org/education/articles/digital-redlining-access-and-privacy.
Glenn, E. N. (2002). Unequal freedom: How race and gender shaped American freedom and labor. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Goodling, L. (2015). MOAR digital activism, please. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 19(3). Retrieved from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/19.3/topoi/goodling/index.html.
Grabowski, M. & Yeng, S. (2013). To post or not to post: Philosophical and ethical considerations for mug shot websites. In D. Heider & A. Massanari (Eds). Digital ethics: Research and practice (pp. 99-116). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
Haas, A. M. (2018). Toward a digital cultural rhetoric. In J. Alexander & J. Rhodes (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Digital Writing and Rhetoric (412-22).
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege or partial perspectives. Feminist Studies, 14, pp. 575-599.
Harding, S. (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell UP.
--. (1993). Rethinking standpoint epistemology: What is ‘strong objectivity’? In Alcoff, L. & Potter, E. (Eds). Feminist Epistemologies. London: Routledge.
Hayes, T. J. (2017). #MyNYPD: Transforming twitter into a public place for protest. Computers and Composition, 43, pp. 118-134.
Hess, A. (2018). Introduction: Theorizing digital rhetoric. In Hess, A. & Davisson. A. (Eds). Theorizing digital rhetoric (pp. 1-16). London, England: Routledge.
Hill Collins, P. H. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 14(4), pp. 745-773.
Hill Collins, P. H. (2002). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. London, England: Routledge.
Holbrook, S. E. (1991). Women’s work: The feminizing of composition. Rhetoric Review, 9(2): 201-29.
hooks, b. (2000). Feminist theory: from margin to center. Cambridge, MA: South End Press.
Intemann, K. (2010). 25 years of feminist empiricism and standpoint theory: Where are we now? Hypatia, 25(4), pp. 778-796.
Johnson, M., Levy, D., Manthey, K., & Novotny, M. (2015). Embodiment: Embodying feminist rhetorics. Peitho, 18(1), pp. 39-43.
Jones Royster, J. (2000). Traces of the stream: Literacy and social change among African-american women. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Kennedy, K., & Wilson, N. (2019). In Reyman, J. & Sparby, E.M. (Eds.) Digital ethics: Rhetoric and responsibility in online aggression (pp. 198-215). New York, NY: Routledge.
Langford, C. L. & Speight, M. #BlackLives Matter: Epistemic positioning, challenges, and possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Rhetoric, 5(3/4), pp.78-89.
Lewis, T. (2006). Critical surveillance literacy. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 6(2), pp. 263–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532708605279700.
Long, S., & Fitch, K. (2019) Digital surveillance of gang communication: graffiti’s rhetorical velocity between street gangs and urban law enforcement. In Jim Ridolfo. & William Hart-Davidson (Eds.) Rhet ops: Rhetoric and information warfare (pp. 170-182). Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh UP.
Lorde, A. (1984). Sister outsider: Essays and speeches. Trumansburg, NY: Crossing Press.
Lyon, D. (2007). Surveillance studies: An overview. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Marx, G.T. (1998). Ethics of a new surveillance. The Information Society, 14, pp. 171-185.
--. (2015). Surveillance Studies. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, Second Edition, pp. 733–741.
McCall, L. (2005). The complexity of intersectionality. Signs, 30(3), pp. 1771-1800.
McKee, H.A., & Porter, J.E. (2017). Professional communication and network interaction: A rhetorical and ethical approach. New York, NY: Routledge.
Miller, S. (1991). The feminization of composition. In, R. Bullock & J. Trimbur (Eds.), The politics of writing instruction: Postsecondary. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook.
Novotny, M. & Hutchinson, L. (2019). Data our bodies tell: Towards critical feminist action in fertility and period tracking applications. Technical Communication Quarterly, 28(4), pp. 332-360.
Opel, D. (2018). Ethical research in health 2.0: Considerations for scholars of medical rhetoric. In L. Meloncon & J. B. Scott (Eds.), Methodologies for the rhetoric of health & medicine (pp. 176-194). New York: Routledge.
Perry, G. K. (2009). Black feminist thought. In J. O’Brien (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Gender and Society (74-76). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.
Ridolfo, J. & DeVoss, D. N. (2009). Composing for recomposition: rhetorical velocity and delivery. Kairos: A Journal of Rhetoric, Technology, and Pedagogy 13(2). Retrieved from: http://kairos.technorhetoric.net/13.2/topoi/ridolfo_devoss/velocity.html.
Schell, E. E. Researching feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies. In E. E. Schell &K.J. Rawson (Eds.), Rhetorica in motion: Feminist rhetorical methods and methodologies (pp. 1-20). Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), pp. 33-47.
Tetreault, L. (2019). White women voted for trump: The women’s march on washington and intersectional feminist futures. Computers and Composition Online. Retrieved from: http://cconlinejournal.org/techfem_si/01_Tetreault/
Verloo, M. (2013). Intersectional and cross-movement politics and policies: Reflections on current practices and debates. Signs, 38(4), pp. 893-915.
Vie, S. (2008). Digital divide 2.0: ‘Generation m’ and online social networking sites in the composition classroom. Computers and Composition, 25, pp. 9-23.
Walton, R., Moore, K. R., & Jones, N.N. (2019). Technical communication after the social justice turn: Building coalitions for action. New York: Routledge.
Wylie, (2003). Why standpoint matters. In Robert Figueroa & Sandra Harding (Eds.), Science and other cultures: Issues in philosophy of science and technology (pp. 26-48). New York: Routledge.